+1 (800) 257‑1254 Connect with our team
Market Commentary

The land is the asset

In a manufactured-housing community the resident owns the home and the community owner holds the ground — the component of U.S. home value that has done the appreciating. The thesis in one causal argument, with the evidence one link away.

Ryan Smith Aug 20268 min read

Key takeaways

8 sources ↓
  • The ownership split: residents own the homes; the community owner holds the ground — streets, utilities, pads.
  • Where the value went: land rose 261% against 49% for structures, 2012–2023; land's share of U.S. home value went 35.7% to 57.4%.
  • Parity, measured: a federal price index puts real-property-titled manufactured homes within two-tenths of a point of site-built appreciation over 25 years.
  • Discipline, printed: the watch list and the dated market snapshot ride with the thesis, not apart from it.

This is the argument in one sentence: in a manufactured-housing community the resident owns the home and the community owner holds the ground — and the ground is the half of an American home that has been doing the appreciating. This article makes that case and shows its work. The evidence lives in four companion pieces — the operating record, the supply story, the policy catalyst, and the tax map — linked at the end of this page and standing on their own files.

You are not buying homes

The first thing most underwriters get wrong about a land-lease community is what the asset is. The resident owns the home. The community owner owns the ground beneath it — and the ground is the part of American housing that has been doing all the appreciating.

The split matters because it answers the first question every sceptical investor asks: “Don’t manufactured homes depreciate, like cars?” The honest answer is that the resident’s home — titled as personal property in roughly four of five new placements — behaves like a structure. Which is exactly the point. The appreciating asset was never the structure. It is underneath it, on the sponsor’s side of the ledger.

Figure 1.1 · Who owns what

A community, split down the property line

Select either side — or hover the picture — to see where each dollar of the asset lives. Rent is charged for the site, not the house, so the revenue is a land rent. And the residents stay: moving a home costs $5,000–$15,000, which is why annual physical move-outs at the largest institutional owner average 0.3%.

The land-lease ownership model The resident owns the home, titled as personal property. The community owner owns the land beneath it, plus roads, water and sewer, drainage and pads — historically the appreciating component of U.S. home value. THE HOMES — OWNED BY RESIDENTS Titled as personal property in ~4 of 5 new placements. Housing, not an investment vehicle. THE LAND — OWNED BY THE COMMUNITY OWNER Ground · roads · water & sewer · drainage · site electrical · pads — historically the appreciating component of U.S. home value Illustrative — not to scale
Show the work — sources & scope
Adapted from: Elevation Capital Group, “The Land Is the Asset,” July 2026. Move-out and relocation-cost figures: Sun Communities investor deck, 1 June 2026 (annual physical home move-outs average 0.3%, MH sites, North America, Jan 2024 – Mar 2026); ECG learning centre (relocation cost $5,000–$15,000; resident turnover of 5–10% versus 40–50% for conventional apartments).
Scope — say this plainly, every time: this is not a claim that homes sited in a land-lease community appreciate like site-built houses. The resident’s home is housing, not an investment vehicle. What the community owner holds is land. Saying so is what earns the right to make the land argument at all.

Figure 1.2 · Where the value went

Land +261%. Structures +49%.

Between 2012 and 2023, American land prices rose more than five times as fast as the structures standing on them — and land went from roughly a third of what a home is worth to more than half. In a land-lease community, that left-hand bar is the sponsor’s side of the ledger.

U.S. home value decomposition, 2012–2023

Left: cumulative price growth. Right: land’s share of total home value.

+261%
Land prices, 2012–2023
+49%
Structure prices, same period
57.4%
of total U.S. home value is now land — up from 35.7% in 2012
Data table
Show the work — sources & attribution
Source: American Enterprise Institute Housing Center data, as reported by the Urban Institute, “Manufactured Homes Increase in Value at the Same Pace as Site-Built Homes” (Goodman & Pang, 19 November 2024).
Attribution precision: the four percentages are reported secondhand by Urban — they are not published on AEI’s own Land Price and Land Share Indicators page. Cite as “AEI Housing Center data, as reported by the Urban Institute.” Historical data; past performance does not guarantee future results.

Figure 1.3 · The depreciation question, answered by a regulator

Parity, to two-tenths of a point over 25 years

In October 2024 the Federal Housing Finance Agency launched a Manufactured House Price Index — the first federal index tracking manufactured home appreciation. Its finding: since Q1 2000, manufactured homes titled as real property have appreciated in line with site-built homes. +219.0% against +218.8%. The claim to make is parity, and only parity — the gap changes sign depending on which quarter you measure to, which is the definition of a tie. A tie is unattackable.

Cumulative house price appreciation, Q1 2000 – Q2 2025 · both rebased to 100

FHFA Manufactured House Price Index (real-property-titled homes) vs. FHFA House Price Index

Data table
Show the work — sources & the two disclosures that stay
Source: Federal Housing Finance Agency, purchase-only FHFA HPI® for Real Property Manufactured Homes and FHFA House Price Index, current vintage retrieved 6 August 2026; index launched 9 October 2024. fhfa.gov/data/hpi/datasets
Two disclosures that travel with this figure. The index covers only homes titled as real property with Enterprise financing — Census shows 78% of new placements in 2024 were titled as personal property and sit outside it. That exclusion is why the land, not the structure, is the asset underwritten here (see Figure 1.1). And FHFA labels this a Developmental Index, subject to methodology change. Two endpoints are shown because both series are rebased; the intermediate path is not implied. Claim parity, never outperformance: the gap flips sign across vintages (Urban’s 2000–2024 figures run 211.8% vs 212.6% the other way).

That is the whole argument. The proof lives in the companion pieces — the operating record, the supply story, the policy catalyst and the tax map — linked at the end of this page. What stays here is the part a reader should never have to hunt for: how we underwrite it, and where the market stands right now.

What we watch

Every deck in this sector reads as though nothing could go wrong. Here are the four things that actually could — each led by how it is underwritten. An investor who hears this from the sponsor first does not hear it from a sceptic later.

Rent discipline

Underwrite below the sector’s trend rent growth.

Sector rent growth has run 6–7%, which invites legislation — rent-control proposals have already widened cap rates roughly 50 bps in affected states. Assume less than trend; avoid concentration in states with active bills.

Growth from operations

Model NOI from rate and expense discipline, not lease-up.

The asset class climbed from ~83% occupancy in 2008 to ~95% today. That seventeen-year re-rating is finished and will not repeat. Any plan that needs it to is a plan not worth writing.

Two return horizons

Show the five-year number next to the twenty-year one.

MH REITs are the best 20-year performer of any REIT sector at 11.5% — and among the weakest over five, at −4.3% annually. A thesis resting on the 20-year figure alone does not survive diligence, so print both.

Operating leverage

Manage the communities in-house.

Insurance and payroll are the live constraint on NOI — UMH reported community operating expenses up roughly 10% year over year. This is an operating problem before it is a market one, which is where vertical integration earns its keep, or doesn’t.

Show the work — sources
Sources: Multi-Housing News (Feb 2026) on rent-control cap-rate impact; Northmarq Q1 2026 occupancy; FTSE Nareit Equity Manufactured Homes index returns through 31 July 2026; UMH Properties FY2025 10-K on operating expense growth; Sun Communities 10-K disclosures on the 2000s occupancy trough.
Why this section faces the negative on a page that otherwise doesn’t: naming a risk plainly is not a double negative — it is the opposite of one, and it is the section a sophisticated allocator remembers. The framing choice is in the ordering: each card leads with the underwriting response, so the reader meets the discipline before the problem.

The market right now

Scarcity is not only an operating fact; it is a price. On Green Street’s single-methodology index of twelve property sectors, manufactured home parks carry the highest index level of any of them — the supply story prints the whole ranking.

Rents rising, occupancy at a record — current, dated, and first-party where possible, with the largest allocators in the world buying into it.

$772
average lot rent nationally — up 6.0% across 2025 and 6.8% in Q1 2026; sector rent gains have averaged 6.0–7.7% since mid-2022
95.0%
occupancy across the asset class — and 97.8% MH same-property at Sun Communities, the largest institutional owner, at 30 June 2026
+8.8%
same-property NOI, Q2 2026 — Sun’s MH segment; +8.9% for full-year 2025 (company-wide North America: +5.7%)
+26%
transaction volume, Q1 2026 year over year, with median price per space up 12% — liquidity returning, not leaving
10→20%
institutional share of MHC dollar volume — doubled in twelve months
$10bn+
Brookfield & GIC / Yes! Communities — ~300 communities, 55,000+ homesites; cleared EU review January 2026. Drake Fund V raised $515M+; HARRI5 did $800M across 27 transactions in 2025

Northmarq (Q1 2026 transactions; FY2025 rent & occupancy); Sun Communities 8-K, 27 July 2026; IPA / Marcus & Millichap 2H 2025 National Report; public reporting on the Yes! Communities transaction. Figures describe the asset class and third-party operators, not any Elevation offering.

The bottom line

Sources

  1. Federal Housing Finance Agency — FHFA HPI datasets, including the purchase-only Manufactured House Price Index (launched 9 October 2024). https://www.fhfa.gov/data/hpi/datasets
  2. Urban Institute — Goodman & Pang, “Manufactured Homes Increase in Value at the Same Pace as Site-Built Homes,” 19 November 2024. https://www.urban.org/urban-wire/manufactured-homes-increase-value-same-pace-site-built-homes
  3. AEI Housing Center land price and land share data, as reported by the Urban Institute (source 2).
  4. Northmarq — manufactured housing transaction activity Q1 2026; rent and occupancy FY2025. https://www.northmarq.com/insights/insights/manufactured-housing-transaction-activity-rises-year-over-year-q1-2026
  5. IPA / Marcus & Millichap — 2H 2025 Manufactured Housing National Report.
  6. SEC filings — Sun Communities (8-Ks of 27 July 2026, 1 June 2026, 25 February 2026); UMH Properties FY2025 10-K; Equity LifeStyle Properties.
  7. Elevation Capital Group — “The Land Is the Asset” (July 2026); “Cost segregation: why investors love it, and what it takes to use it” (4 August 2026). https://www.elevationcapitalgroup.com/investing/research
  8. Green Street Commercial Property Price Index, 4 June 2026 release — index level by sector (twelve property sectors plus the all-property benchmark); the full ranking is Figure 1.2 of “Nobody is making more of these.” https://info.greenstreet.com/hubfs/GSCPPI-20260604press.pdf

Educational content only: not investment, legal, or tax advice, or an offer of any security. See full disclosures.

Investor Login Browse Offerings

You’re shaping this site

Beta feedback

We ask for your name and email so we can aggregate all your feedback and ask questions if any arise. Your information will not be sold or otherwise used beyond the purpose of evaluating your feedback.